Entertainment
 

Memory Alpha:Nominations for featured articles

From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference

Revision as of 17:45, January 17, 2005 by BlueMars (Talk | contribs)

This page is for the nomination and discussion of articles that may be potentially included in Memory Alpha's list of featured articles. Featured articles are also displayed on the main page of the wiki. A featured article is an especially well-written, informative, and comprehensive article that covers all available information on a subject.

Any registered user may nominate any article for inclusion in the list of featured articles. When you nominate an article, include a short description of why you think that the article should be featured. If you are nominating an article that you have worked on, please note that fact in your description. The nomination is then open to discussion, and anyone may comment about the inclusion of the article in the list. For voting ("Support" or "Oppose") you have to fulfill some requirements. And, as always, please sign your nominations and comments with "~~~~".

When you are commenting on a nomination, please take the time to read the entire article before you decide whether to support or oppose the nomination.

A nomination can be resolved if it has been inactive for seven days. It is considered successful if there have been five or more votes, with all objections resolved.

Optionally, a notice that the article has been nominated as a featured article candidate may be added to the article by inserting {{fac}} at the top or bottom of the article.

See also


Nominations without objections

  • Hirogen: I think i've got everything, and I think it's writen well enough to be featured. Having a second set of eyes scan it over with some scrutiny couldn't hurt. Tyrant 03:06, 17 Jan 2005 (CET)Tyrant
    • Supported. --BlueMars 18:45, Jan 17, 2005 (CET)
  • USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D): I think all information available on the ship is now included, and it makes a great article. Ottens 13:27, 15 Jan 2005 (CET)
    • Supported. Lots of good information from different contributors. -- SmokeDetector47 02:04, 2005 Jan 16 (CET)
    • Seconded. --BlueMars 18:45, Jan 17, 2005 (CET)
  • Breen: Worth to be a featured article thanks to numerous contributors. --BlueMars 15:09, Jan 13, 2005 (CET)
    • I'll second that, the Breen page is great. --Tyrant
    • It's not great, but its far more superior than it was before, considering how little information exists, but then again, its better than James T. Kirk, which somehow slipped through the cracks to become featured. --Gvsualan 18:58, 13 Jan 2005 (CET)
    • Seconded. All available info is given and presented well. --BlueMars 18:45, Jan 17, 2005 (CET)
  • William T. Riker. User:SmokeDetector47 significantly expanded this article and it's now worth to be featured. --BlueMars 16:02, Jan 3, 2005 (CET)
    • Support. Thanks for rearranging and adding some images; I was having trouble trying to decide how to use them. -- SmokeDetector47 02:04, 2005 Jan 16 (CET)
    • My God, that's one hell of an article. Definately supported! Ottens 14:36, 16 Jan 2005 (CET)
  • Kor. Good and extensive article on the Dahar master. Nicely done User:Gvsualan. --BlueMars 00:53, Dec 28, 2004 (CET)
  • I'll second that. Tyrant 14:26, 16 Jan 2005 (CET)Tyrant
  • Emissary. Extensive and well sorted information on the Emissary of the Prophets. Good work. --BlueMars 18:21, Dec 24, 2004 (CET)

Nominations with objections

  • Mission to Horatius. I think that this is a good article that is growing. Luke80.
    • I disagree. The article at least needs a cover image, a better "plot summary" and needs to be wikified (including links). Additionally, there still seem to be some errors (NGC 400 vs. 434, for example) -- Cid Highwind 11:21, 2004 Dec 31 (CET)
    • Agreed with Cid. Objected, for now. Ottens 14:37, 16 Jan 2005 (CET)
  • Equinox, Part I and Equinox, Part II. Self-nomination, just added all details to this episode which I can think of. A few dead links at the moment, but I'm working on them -- MiChaos 19:09, 7 Nov 2004 (CET).
    • Supported, but like Parallels, needs some pictures... Of course, thats not a reason to seriously object, but a suggestion. Ottens 19:20, 8 Nov 2004 (CET)