Category talk:Fictional technology

From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference

[edit] Fictional Objects

We have a Category:Fictional characters, and an Category:Aliases, but nothing for objects which are made up, such as the USS Lollipop, Firomactal drive, and others. Maybe a Fictional Objects category?--31dot 21:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Category:Fictional technology? --Alan 21:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

That sounds better. --31dot 21:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Support. --From Andoria with Love 15:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Upon looking, the USS Voyeur probably would go in this category as well.--31dot 17:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps Corbomite as well.--31dot 21:48, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Support - Another one: USS Vortex– Cleanse 23:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Support. Don't forget USS Lollipop.--Long Live the United Earth 13:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I didn't, see above. :) --31dot 22:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Created or Fictional Technobabble

Looking through the pages that are uncatagorized, I found some of the terms that Riker created to confuse Morta in "Rascals". Wondering if a sub-catagory of Category:Terminology could be created for this. Something like "Created Terminology", "Fictional Terminology", ect. Wondering about everyones' thoughts on this. The articles themselves reference gibberish that just links to Technobabble. Here are the articles:

• Bilateral kelilactiral
• Redundant melacortz ramistat
• FTL nanoprocessor
• Firomactal drive
• Primary heisenfram terminal
• Isopalavial interface
• Ontarian manifold
• KRG

Thanks. ---- Willie ^LLAP 18:26, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I like it. Maybe call it Fictional technology. --- Jaz 20:04, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

How is this different than what is suggested above? --Alan 20:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm a little biased, but I don't think it is any different. I don't think it should be a subcategory of Terminology.--31dot 00:22, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Honestly, I did read the above section, but for some reason, I did not connect the two issues. Having said that, I'll support these terms being thrown into Fictional Technology. Sorry for the confusion. ---- Willie ^LLAP 14:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

• Archived --Alan 17:58, 20 April 2008 (UTC)