Talk:11:59 (episode)/peerreview

From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference

[edit] "11:59"

I think this summary is complete but it needs some grammer checks and proofreading before considering applying it for FA nomination. -- Q 16:43, 23 Oct 2005 (UTC)

No bad grammer or misspellings, no problems at all with this article, nothing ? -- Q 17:30, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I like the way it's divided into sections in a creative way instead of "Act 1," "Act 2," etc. Don't have time to read it right now though, sorry. --Broik 17:48, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The tense changes partway through the story. If the intent is to have the past stuff in past tense, shouldn't the summary revert to present tense at the end? Could use a good going over- I caught several grammatical errors just skimming a couple of paragraphs. Also I think the summary is too long. --9er 17:50, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I tried to keep the VOY action in present tense and the 20th century in past tense. I don't see it as a problem to change tense over the course of the epsiode. Ending it with past tense, well, why not. I would be nice if you could point out some off the grammatical errors, myself being not fluent in English et al. Summary length is not an issue, not to me atleast, there are FA's who have the same length. I do admit the longer the summary the harder it is to write a good one. (summary length also came up at some FA discussions) -- Q 18:26, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Added some links, references, etc, formatted the table. do the unnamed characters go in Unnamed Humans (20th century) or Unnamed Humans (21st century) ? -- Captain Mike K. Bartel^talk 06:32, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Depends on the century they lived in. The passerby should fit in the Unamed Humans 20th century. Don't know the exact reason for unamed humans though. Should it be added to every episode were unamed humans appeared ? -- Q 18:26, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I asked because during the episode doesn't the new century begin?

Every episode that has an unnamed character should have an "unnamed" list linked to house info about unnamed characters (Epsilon IX personnel for example) -- Captain Mike K. Bartel^talk

Well, I think I've got the most problems solved with this article but I would appreciate a last second opinion. -- Q 20:52, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)