Talk:Endeavour (OV-105)
From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference
[edit] Merge
It was suggested that this be merged with space shuttle. Making it an official suggestion. Discuss below. --From Andoria with Love 03:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Definitely. No need for separate pages. -- Cid Highwind 15:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- This ship is canonically as it's name is shown on a mission insignia. So, there is really no need to merge it. However, I agree with you that the other shuttle articles, save Enterprise, should be merged or deleted.– Airtram3 08:06, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Merge. - Archduk3:talk 16:28, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
- No merge. I for one don't agree. All these separate shuttle pages have some notes in them, info and links. Also, there are hundreds and hundreds of planet-, item-, starship- and people-pages of single appearance things that only appear on illegible lists or are mentioned in dialogue. We should not start a trend of compacting MA for the sake of making all the pages we have look more full. --Pseudohuman 18:00, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
- This is true. But on the other hand, I'd like to see more proof/evidence of the source that this shuttle was referenced, as the article certainly lacks said information as well. --Alan 18:38, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
- No merge. I for one don't agree. All these separate shuttle pages have some notes in them, info and links. Also, there are hundreds and hundreds of planet-, item-, starship- and people-pages of single appearance things that only appear on illegible lists or are mentioned in dialogue. We should not start a trend of compacting MA for the sake of making all the pages we have look more full. --Pseudohuman 18:00, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
- Merge. - Archduk3:talk 16:28, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
- This ship is canonically as it's name is shown on a mission insignia. So, there is really no need to merge it. However, I agree with you that the other shuttle articles, save Enterprise, should be merged or deleted.– Airtram3 08:06, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
