Talk:First Battle of Chin'toka
From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference
Contents |
[edit] FA nomination
Might as well nominate all articles linked to in this msg. -- Redge 15:52, 13 May 2004 (CEST)
- Archiving: Originally tagged as "Featured" by User:MinutiaeMan at 11:02, May 16, 2004. --Alan del Beccio 21:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ships involved
Any chance we can add known ships involved in this battle to the article somehow. I'm not sure it warrants a page like List of starships at Wolf 359, but some mention should be specifically made to the ships known to have participated. --Gvsualan 04:20, 8 Apr 2005 (EDT)
- Do you mean actual ship names, or classes? I believe the Akira first made its appearance here...? 142.151.186.203 16:34, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
In retrospect, I'm really not sure what I meant exactly. --Alan del Beccio 21:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Romulan losses?
I didn't see any Romulan warbirds destroyed on-screen. I was watching the syndicated version of the episode, though, so there may be some deleted scenes where one or more Romulan ships are lost. However, if it turns out that there were no (or extremely light compared to the Federation and Klingon) losses, that may be a relevant note to place in the article. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.33.88.35 (talk).
- I think I saw two D'deridex-class warbirds go down.--The All-knowing Sith'ari 22:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] What about this for the page?
| |
| Part of: | Dominion War |
| Location: | Chin'toka system |
| Combatants: | Federation Alliance: |
| Strength: | Federation Alliance:
Romulan Fleet
|
| Casualties: | Federation Alliance:
|
Well?--The All-knowing Sith'ari 22:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- No offense, especially since I'm sure it took a bit of time compiling the info and putting it together, but this sidebar/infobox really does not help the page at all... at the moment, it looks awful, particularly with all the images pushed down to the bottom and a huge empty space between the text and the template. Can we please remove it? --From Andoria with Love 04:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Ah, I did the same for Operation Return. Any way to fix that huge empty space?--The All-knowing Sith'ari 13:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- The long infobox just didn't look right on these pages at all. An infobox is supposed to contain brief supplementary info of the main points of the article, not every single ship that fought in every single battle and what-not. They're supposed to supplement the article, not cram the article's contents to the left while at the same time hiding other parts of the article (namely, templates). --From Andoria with Love 22:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Now that the infoboxes are shorter, I don't suppose...--The All-knowing Sith'ari 12:41, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Since I'm not getting any replies I'll put it back anyway...--The All-knowing Sith'ari 15:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- The infobox is still going to crunch the other images on the page. I still maintain it's no necessary. In addition, to reiterate, "An infobox is supposed to contain brief supplementary info of the main points of the article, not every single ship that fought in every single battle and what-not." Perhaps there is another way you can go about this besides a sidebar? Like maybe a table or grid near the bottom of the page? --From Andoria with Love 08:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Just tell me how an it will be so.--The All-knowing Sith'ari 19:25, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
