Talk:I, Mudd (episode)

From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference.

Contents 1 Episode talk page 1.1 Maintenance links 2 2267 or 2268? 3 Alice 66 and Alice 99

WAY to much user commentary, this isn't Mystery Science Theater 3000. "Um... isn't that true of any planet!" and "Eep!" I think cover it. There are also probably a dozen links that need to be linked. - AJHalliwell 03:13, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I've changed it to something more sensible. I hope this is more appropriate. Just having a little fun. 07:28, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Does this page still need the pna-tag? table is now wikified, but template was also assigned because of links and spelling -- Kobi - (Talk) 16:28, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Actually, I think it was really given the pna-tag because of my frivolous treatment of the synopsis. I added some links, but not all that many. I'm almost completely sure that my spelling was accurate. So it probably just needs someone to decide that the synopsis is reasonable enough. Jm307 21:40, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 2267 or 2268?

Which year does this episode take place in? Some articles say 2268, others say 2267. Is there definitive evidence one way or another? Egan Loo 02:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

See my response at Talk:2267. --From Andoria with Love 04:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alice 66 and Alice 99

I was watching "I, Mudd" again this evening and for the first time in 40 years I noticed during the scene where Mudd is preparing to beam up to the Enterprise, of the four Alices present, the two on the left are numbers 1 and 2, and the two on the right are numbers 99 and 66. The first thought that came into my head was, "Get Smart". Does anyone know if this was an intentional reference to "Get Smart", or just a coincidence? 138.88.45.183 01:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)