Talk:Mudd's Women (episode)

From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference

Contents 1 Episode talk page 1.1 Maintenance links 2 Window? 3 Trailer Music 4 On the Subject of Nitpicks 5 Sartonian Slave Girls 6 Thenners 7 Speculation to refute speculation 8 Background Cleanup 9 Cheap Federation 10 Additional uncredited performers

[edit] Window?

Do we really know Kirk has a window in his quarters? I watched and couldn't find anything. Where and in what scene is it really noticeable? Thank you.

When Mudd comes to Kirk's quarters, a deeply recessed square with blue lighting can be seen behind the Captain. Also visible in "The Enemy Within" and "The Man Trap." Logical assumption is, it's a window with a sliding panel that is closed. A few episodes later, it's gone.

[edit] Trailer Music

This isn't the only episode whose trailer has music written for it. The Man Trap's previews are also new music specifically for the trailer.

• Good grief, you're right-- never occured to me it wasn't lifted from the episode. I shall edit my comments. However, it's a bit less unusual in this case, because Alexander Courage also did the episode's score, whilst in "Mudd's Women", Fred Steiner composed the music.

I wish GNP Crescendo would release the "Man Trap" soundtrack on CD.

[edit] On the Subject of Nitpicks

Greetings! Having been using this site for several months as a supplementary reference for Star Trek, making small additions where I see their needs, and being impressed with the high standards generally exhibited in maintaining this site, for the first time I see something to which I truly object: At least several episode pages in TOS have a "Nitpicks" section. http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/Nitpicks.html defines nitpick as to "criticize something pettily: to find insignificant details of something unsatisfactory, often unjustifiably". Unjustifiable and petty criticism of insignificant details does not belong in an encyclopedia. Some nitpicking may merely indicate a lack of insight on the part of the author. In addition, the validity of a nitpick often varies subjectively from person to person. Therefore, I propose that "Nitpicks" sections on episode pages be renamed, say, to something like "Errors and Inconsistencies", or maybe "Errors or Inconsistencies". In this way, objectively problematic issues can still be recorded about the episodes, in a manner both that encourages their inclusion, but especially also that encourages the removal of material that is more of a personal preference or in only a particular person's opinion. Subjective nitpicks about episodes are not canon, are they?

I strongly suggest that we deleted the nickpicks or merg them with background information. Either way, they have to go. --AC84 19:51, 10 Nov 2005 (PST)

• I have no problem with them being re-named to a more "P.C." monicker, however, you will note that on some episode entries they are in the background info and in some they are in their own section.

They should remain, however-- it is fun to see people's observations of bloopers and gaffes. I would agree they should be notations of what is actually seen or heard on screen, and not people's personal gripes with episode content.

Nits are being discussed in Ten Forward here. I suggest y'all go there, since there you'll get more community input there. :-) -- Miranda Jackson ^(Talk) 23:05, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sartonian Slave Girls

One of the slave women, the blonde one, says something about not wanting to be treated like a "sartonian slave girl" while Mudd is being investigated. I assume that there are no more references to Sartonians in the rest of Star Trek, because I searched for it and didn't find anything here. But shouldn't they be mentioned somewhere on this site, even if we never see one? -Tom

The term that is used by Eve McHuron is "Staring at us like we were Saturnius harem girls or something.". --Jörg 17:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thenners

I removed the latter part of this background note:

Eddie Paskey appears in green coveralls for the only time in the series as "Connors" in sickbay, although it sounds like DeForest Kelley calls him "Thenners."

To whom did this sound like? It sounded to me like he said "Connors." - Bridge 14:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speculation to refute speculation

I removed this speculation today... that was added to refute speculation.

* Fans have often observed a plot error in that, after his ship's hearing where Mudd is left alone in the briefing room with two security guards, he concocts his plan to contact the lithium miners and then loudly boasts that he will be running the starship and Kirk will soon be taking orders from him. All the while, two security guards stand in the background listening to the entire conversation yet do not apparently report this to Kirk or any higher authority. This can easily be explained, however, as the security guards were around all three of Mudd's women and may have been so mesmerized so as not to pay too much attention to Mudd. It is also possible that the guards did report what they heard, only to have it dismissed by Kirk until it was too late.

Speculation that refutes speculation is still speculation. -- Sulfur 18:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Gosh, and I was rather proud of that. Anyway, there is a precedent for having it as there is a note in "The Naked Time" where the plot error about Sulu getting grabbed by three people on the bridge (who do not get the disease) is discussed and explained that we dont know that much about the disease. The above note also has some canon back-up in that its discussed in The Star Trek Compendium and is number one on the list for the episode in thhe Nitpicker's Guide to Star Trek. I know the last book is itself about goofs but this is a famous one from the episode. Can we factor it in somehow? -FleetCaptain 19:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Background Cleanup

I removed the following because it appears to be (unusual) speculation:

• Each of the three women represents a different primal element: Eve McHuron was born on a farming planet (earth); Ruth Bonaventure lived on a pelagic (water) planet; and Magda Kovacs is described as having come from the "Halium Experimental Station" (air). Although the fourth element – fire – is not represented, presumably this is accounted for by the intense desire all three women create among the male crewmen of the Enterprise.

If there's a source, fine, but otherwise it seems just wierd. – Cleanse 11:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cheap Federation

Isn't weird that the Enterprise doesn't carry any extra Dilithium circuits or even some unrefined Ore. I know the stuff is rare and valuable, but this is the freakin Enterprise, the Federation flagship. As per Kirk there are only 12 like it in service. I would imagine that modern nuclear subs and aircraft carriers might conceivably carry extra fuel or at least a backup propulsion system. If they don't its because there is no way to safely store the nuclear material. Dilithium ore on the other hand is nontoxic enough to be touched with ones bare hands and is apparently easily converted into a workable circuit. Considering how important the Enterprise is to Federation defense, the length of the mission and the apparent ease at which they can burn out, you would think the Federation wouldn't have skimped on the spare dilithium.

Well, that wouldn't be a very good story. Captain's Log, Stardate 4012.8: The Enterprise has suffered a serious shortage of self-sealing stem bolts. Thankfully, Scotty found a couple extras in the cargo bay. End Log. :) --- Jaz 05:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

In addition, remember that in TOS the Enterprise was not the flagship, just another starship of the fleet. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 12:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Additional uncredited performers

We can add Ron Veto to the list; he appears, in a blue shirt, at 7:40 as the women are making their way from the transporter room to the turbolift.

In addition, I'm 99% sure that's Frank Da Vinci as Brent eight seconds earlier. If so, this might be the only episode where he appears as both Brent and Vinci.--72.229.231.18 16:48, September 7, 2009 (UTC)Jim in NYC