Talk:Multi-spatial force field

From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference

Contents 1 Wikifying 2 Wow!! 3 You're awesome!! 4 Video clip 5 Media GIF 6 pna

[edit] Wikifying

This article still needs a lot of wikifying. In addition, these red links should be fixed, the articles do exist, just not under these links. A lot of other work needed here too. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 06:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I am very new to this. I have never contributed to this type of forum before. If you could help me with the links and clean it up, I would appreciate it. I really want this article to be up to snuff. :D

Thanks,

James

[edit] Wow!!

Hey,

Thanks for editing and improving my article so quickly!! thanks!

James

I.E. IP address originally recorded with this article prior to creating an account tonight.

[edit] You're awesome!!

You've all done a great job of improving this article for me. Thanks soo much!!!

Best Regards,

James

[edit] Video clip

Can the video clip be made so that it can be clicked on to be played without having to remain on continuous play? It's neat to see, but it gets kind of annoying. Jaf 02:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Jaf

[edit] Media GIF

Done!! Take a look at the page, I made it so you can look at the video separately.

Hope this helps,

James

[edit] pna

Speculation may need to be removed, also the "!!", and the images need meaningful captions. Also, the image pages need captions, sources, and licence info. --Bp 05:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Also, after checking the transcript [1] of the episode, it has become apparent that the information in the article is full of errors. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 05:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Looking more at that transcript, most of the errors I can fix, but one is big and glaring. They never actual call it "multi-spatial shield" in the episode, but rather "multi-spatial force field". --OuroborosCobra ^talk 05:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

OK, I have moved the article to the correct name, and corrected the errors so that the info is accurate to the episode. The issues with the image captions, and the images themselves, still need to be fixed. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 05:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)