Talk:Starfleet Security
From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference
Contents |
[edit] Starfleet Security (Earth)
do we really need to create short articles for dual aspects shared by both Starfleet and the Earth Starfleet? the two are separate enitites in name, so they are assigned separate articles.. but organizations like Starfleet Security and Starfleet Medical seem to be implied to be the same organizations both before and after their parent organization became Federated -- up to sharing the same charter, as revelations about Section 31 seem to indicate -- after all, we probably aren't considering a Section 31 (Earth) article any time soon, and existing articles like Starfleet ranks and Starfleet uniform have a shared format. -- Captain Mike K. Bartel 05:08, 8 Mar 2005 (GMT)
[edit] From Talk:Security
Shran asked the question why the second paragraph was italicized. The answer is it was like that before I modified the article and I just kept the formatting. I've no problem either way, but I think he is right that it is best put into a normal font. Aholland 12:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but for the record, I wasn't putting the blame on you, I knew the paragraph was italicized before, I was just wondering why. ;) --From Andoria with Love 12:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Federation-centric?
Since we already have the Starfleet Security article, shouldn't the security article be left more generic to the topic at hand, and leave specifics on Federation-based security forces to the former article? So the Bajoran Militia from Deep Space 9, some mention of police forces, etc. may get equal billing? Any Federation-related details can easily be merged with the Starfleet Security article. - Intricated 15:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Makes sense. That would leave this article as little more than a set of links to security-related articles and a definition sorta like: Security is the general practice of protection of individuals, organizations, property, and regions. Security can be ad hoc or organized, civilian or military, offensive or defensive. Does that make sense? Aholland 16:46, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge
Like Intricated noticed a few months ago, almost all the info in this article should be in Starfleet Security. Especially stuff like the personnel list. -- Harry talk 14:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. I concur. Here-here, and all that. :P --From Andoria with Love 04:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Admiral Raner
In "The Pegasus", Admiral Raner was mentioned as head of Starfleet Intelligence. The only thing we know about the unnamed "Chief of Starfleet Security" is that she was female, per Admiral Blackwell's line, "The chief of Starfleet Security herself is watching this one. --TimPendragon 21:11, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Except that Pressman states earlier that "..the chief of Starfleet Security has personally given me her complete support.", to which Riker replies "Admiral Raner?". Blackwell actually refers to the head of Starfleet Intelligence in her line, not Security. -- Michael Warren | Talk 21:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] PNA-incomplete
Additional references:
- DS9: "The Passenger", "The Search, Part I", "Past Tense, Part I", "Field of Fire", "When It Rains...", "Extreme Measures"
- VOY: "State of Flux", "Non Sequitur"
--Alan 15:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Recursive loop
In the first sentence, security is linked, but just redirects back to this article. How bothersome.
