Talk:Storm Front (episode)

From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference

Contents 1 Episode talk page 1.1 Maintenance links 2 Removed comment 3 Reused footage?

Can you provide reference for where it says that "Storm Front" is a two-parter? StarTrek.com seems to indicate it isn't ([1] doesn't mention it being a two-parter, or the first episode being Part I of a two-parter, just the first part of a 'multi-episode arc'). -- Michael Warren 11:48, 16 Jul 2004 (CEST)

Yeah, multiple Trek news sites have carried a press release announcing that Manny Coto has been promoted to Executive Producer, and that the title will be "Storm Front, Part I". Have a look at this. Alex Peckover 12:18, Jul 16, 2004 (CEST)

Does anybody think that the name of this episode was taken from that racist website, stormfront.org?

Added White House screenshot. I'm not good at writing article text, but I can make more screenshots if needed. -- Tired 00:43, 10 Oct 2004 (PDT)

[edit] Removed comment

Removed the following as an uncited similarity:

• It is perhaps not coincidental that the Enterprise intercepted a broadcast of The Shadow radio program, as at the time (1944-45) the lead actor on that series was John Archer.

I did not remove it, but I wasn't sure if the following comment was appropriate. To me, it falls along the same lines as the above comment, but I wasn't sure if this was different since it deals with Star Trek.

This episode is the second time that a character from the past mistakes a character from the future for a naval officer due to their affiliation with the Enterprise, the first being Edith Keeler and Dr. McCoy in City on the Edge of Forever.--31dot 12:19, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reused footage?

Just a thought - I was here watching this episode, and I noticed something that I hadn't before. When they are showing the capabilities of the plasma rifle and the building is destroyed, is that footage from The Killing Game?? I didn't see a mention of it in the article and was just wondering if anyone else noticed that. -- Matt 19:41, 08 Apr 2009 (EDT)

My guess is not, although it's been a bit since I've seen TKG.--31dot 02:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC)