Talk:Temporal displacement policy

From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference

Unless I'm mistaken much of this information comes from the novel Federation and is therefore not suitable for an article here. Avron 02:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Don't know about the citation for this but I don't recall this term being used anywhere on screen. It also seems pretty clear that the same material is covered by Temporal Prime Directive so I suggest this article be merged with that one. Logan 5 17:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

lisen, i am the auther of this page, i have seen the other page it is very weak. if the two pages are merged, then my page will overwelm the other one. As for the Federation thing, yes i did get most of my info from that book, so what? You try being 15 and reading somthing more interesting! Yes, i am a 15 year old startrek fan.

the reasion that i did not edit the Temporal Prime Directive page was that i did not know that it existed!!!

I relly liked this page. i do not understand why anyone whould wish to remove this outstanding articelImage--Noman^&( 23:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't want toremove it anymore. It is up for a vote for deletion. If you follow the link to the discussion on that, you would see that not only was it voted to stay, but that I changed my vote to keep it. The only reason the template is still around is because it is still up for people to vote on. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 00:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

---

thank you. <???>

[edit] Moved from VfD - 23 Jul 2006

[edit] Temporal displacement policy

Article is uncited, and according to the discussion page, the info comes from the novel Federation. Therefore I feel it is non-canon. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 20:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. If the Temporal Prime Directive page is so "weak" as he claims, I'm curious why he didn't just edit it. If there's anything that can be taken from the page that is canon, merge that info. If possible seperate it from the non-canon info and put that in an apocrypha section. - AJ Halliwell 20:56, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep The content is entirely wrong, but Bashir used the term in "Past Tense, Part I". The notes on it on the "Trials and Tribble-ations" & "Wrongs Darker Than Death or Night" make the assumption Sisko was referring to it. -- Tough Little Ship 20:58, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

• Changed to Keep, I did some weeding and cleaned it up. Though the word-for-word usage of it in TaT and WDTDoN should be looked into. - AJ Halliwell 21:15, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

• Change my vote (or whatever you call the thing the person nominating gets) to keep, since it was actually used in canon. --OuroborosCobra ^talk 21:20, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Decision to keep. - AJ Halliwell 10:13, 23 July 2006 (UTC)