Talk:USS Antares

From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference

If the Antares was "not specifically identified", then how do we know she "was briefly seen"? Or should I ask, how can we know she "was briefly seen" if she was "not specifically identified"?

Would it be possible to have someone who has studied this part of the film to restate this sentence in a less paradoxical manner? :D -- Captain MKB 20:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

We know that it was one of the ships in the fleet, because cadets were being assigned to it for that purpose. What we don't know is which ship had which name, because they were not clearly marked(if marked at all by the effects people). We might learn more when it comes out on video. This isn't to say that I don't think the text could be improved, though.--31dot 20:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

I'd say so -- we could reasonably state that "it was one of the ships in the fleet seen onscreen" to avoid giving the impression that the ship was seen in the shuttle as the text suggests now (wasn't the fleet seen mostly after the shuttle docked anyway?). Thoughts? -- Captain MKB 20:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

What you say about when it was seen sounds correct but I can't remember exactly. I wonder if we should just remove the background note, for now at least, as the article pretty much covers what it did and where it was. --31dot 20:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)