Talk:Unification II (episode)
From Memory Alpha, the free Star Trek reference
[edit] Episode talk page
[edit] Maintenance links
- MA images from this episode
- Template:Titles/Unification II yields Unification II (TNG 5x08)
Contents |
[edit] pna-incomplete
Added pna-incomplete at the end of Summary, gaping the holes in subsections Teaser, Act One, Act Two, Act Three, Act Four and Act Five. -- <unsigned>
Did anyone notice towards the end, in the proconsul's office...after Data pinch-nerved Sela, one of the decorative glass obelisk on the desk had a reflection of some man talking... -- <unsigned>
See "nitpick", below <unsigned>
I am certain that one of the old junkyard ships is a star destroyer :P look for it just below the enterprsise around the thirteen minute mark. It's missing its, thing, but otherwise it looks exactly like one. -- <unsigned>
[edit] Updating the Summary
Montrealais - Do you have plans to finish the summary of this episode? It looks good so far. TheBluesMan 00:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Possible 47 reference?
I just watched this episode, and I noted that a message consisting of four characters (1 4 0 0) was sent using the 43-part cipher key that was incoporated into the entry sequence of the Romulan Central Information Net. As I'm sure you are all aware, the sum of 43 added to 4 is 47. --Fraek 12:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- No, I don't think that is a reference. It is bad enough that when we have a random series of numbers, if there is a 4 and a 7 near each other everyone jumps and says "47 REFERENCE! ARGH!" It is a random series of numbers! We have to draw a line somewhere. Now, if someone could find evidence that this was intended to be a 47 reference, like from the Companion or something, that would be ok. --OuroborosCobra talk 12:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, alright, I wasn't aware that such assumptions were quite so common. --Fraek 16:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Shern
References to Shern and his appearance are from the novelization, and therefore non-canon. They should be placed in an Apocrypha section. Gregly 23:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nitpick
- In the scene where Spock, Data and Picard leave the Proconsul's office for the final time, sound technician Bill Gocke can accidentally be seen reflected in a glass ornament on the Proconsul's desk. – Saphsaph 03:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Removed another version of this today.--31dot 19:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Recent changes
Regarding these changes. The first part, "as Spock" implies Leonard Nimoy appeared later as someone else. And in the second paragraph, I thought in order to use "Nimoy" throughout the paragraph using his full name first, as was done before the edit, is required in an encyclopedia. Unless we can just call actors by their last names.
"Nimoy will portray Spock one last time" implies he has said or it has been stated that he will not portray him ever again.
I didn't want to revert anything because well... I don't think I have the qualifications for it because I'm both new and as I've shown in various Talk pages my grasp of English is limited and I could be reading it all wrong =/
P.S. I hope I finally used this "internal links" thing right! – Saphsaph 11:05, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Whose face is in the crystal?
Toward the end of Unification II when Picard, Data, and Spock have just finished sending out the warning about the three vulcan ships and Data neutralizes Sela with a Vulcan nerve pinch, they turn and leave Neral's office. As they do, there is a human face reflected in the crystal centerpiece on the coffee table. Who is this person? I suspect that it might be Gene Roddenberry since Unification I and II seem to be tribute episodes after his death. Can anyone confirm this or name that man? Is this a whoops or an Easter egg?
--Trekster
- I recall that being a boom operator from a previous discussion. — Morder 00:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! Do you have a link to that previous discussion?
--Trekster
- According to us, it was Bill Gocke.– Cleanse 02:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
I was surprised when there was no mention of it on the Unification II page. I knew somebody had to have figured it out before. Thank you so much!
- It is also already mentioned on the appropriate talk page. --Alan 03:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
