m (fm) |
|||
(27 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{shortcut|MA:PR}} |
||
⚫ | The ''' |
||
+ | {{ma nav}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
− | A list of articles currently being peer reviewed can be found here: [[:Category:Memory Alpha peer review]] |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | #Place the template {{tl|peerreview}} on top of the section you want to be peer reviewed. For an entire article, place <nowiki>{{peerreview|article}}</nowiki> at the top of the of the article '''below''' any disambiguations and sidebar. |
||
+ | #Create a new section on the talk page using the title "Peer review", or an alternate title of your choice. See [[Template:Peerreview|here]] for instructions on how to use alternate titles with the template. |
||
⚫ | |||
− | An archive of previously reviewed articles can be found here: |
||
− | [[Memory Alpha:Peer review/archive]] |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
− | #Place the template {{tl|peerreview}} on top of the '''talk page''' of that article. |
||
− | #Click on the "comments" link that appears (it will be red). |
||
− | #Add <nowiki>===[[Name of article]]===</nowiki> (do not forget the brackets) at the top, and below that, give a brief description of what kind of feedback you are looking for. |
||
− | #On this page, under the section that says "Current Peer Reviews", add the following to the '''top''' of the list: <nowiki>{{Talk:Name of article/peerreview}}</nowiki>. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | Removing the template from the article can happen as quickly as feedback is received, and this should generally be done by the archivist who requested the peer review. If a peer review hasn't generated any feedback for awhile, the template should be removed. |
||
+ | == Current peer reviews == |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | <dpl> |
||
− | |||
+ | noresultsheader=:''Currently there are no peer reviews active.'' |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | namespace= |
||
− | To avoid having too many processes at a time, inactive peer review discussions are archived by changing the template to {{tl|oldpeerreview}}, which should stay on the articles' talk page. You may change this template back if you want to continue the peer review at a later point. A peer review is considered inactive if there have been no new comments in the last '''seven days'''. |
||
+ | uses=Template:peerreview |
||
− | |||
+ | format = |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | </dpl> |
||
− | |||
⚫ | |||
− | ==Current Peer Reviews== |
||
− | {{Talk:Federation history/peerreview}} |
||
− | |||
− | {{Talk:Romulan history/peerreview}} |
||
− | |||
− | {{Talk:Andorian history/peerreview}} |
||
− | |||
− | {{Talk:Memorial (episode)/peerreview}} |
Revision as of 07:45, 20 February 2014
The peer review process on Memory Alpha is a way to flag down archivists to help further improve already good articles. All contributors are invited to participate in this process.
Requesting a peer review
To request a peer review for a section of an article, or the entire article, follow these steps:
- Place the template {{peerreview}} on top of the section you want to be peer reviewed. For an entire article, place {{peerreview|article}} at the top of the of the article below any disambiguations and sidebar.
- Create a new section on the talk page using the title "Peer review", or an alternate title of your choice. See here for instructions on how to use alternate titles with the template.
While everyone is invited to improve the article, requesting a peer review first and foremost means that you are willing to actively participate in the process by responding to and resolving issues brought up on the talk page.
Please do not request a peer review if the article still has obvious flaws. In that case, consider using one of the pages needing attention procedures instead. Also, do not request a peer review if you don't plan to play an active role in the process.
Removing requests
Removing the template from the article can happen as quickly as feedback is received, and this should generally be done by the archivist who requested the peer review. If a peer review hasn't generated any feedback for awhile, the template should be removed.
Current peer reviews
- Currently there are no peer reviews active.